| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2953 | [Endian Firewall] Installation | crash | always | 2010-05-30 16:35 | 2010-09-09 01:17 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | Denny Crane | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | subsonica | OS: | |||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | feedback | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | reopened | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Kernel Panic during installation in a VM | ||||
| Description: |
I tryed to install Endian in some VM's Virutal Box 3.2.0 "Kernel panic - not syncing : Fatal exception in interrupt" and on VirtualPC 6.0.156.0 "Kernel panic - not syncing : Attempted to kill the idle task" |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | Fatal_exception_in_interrupt.png (465 KB) 2010-07-12 02:38 | ||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3127 | [Endian Firewall] OpenVPN Client and Server | feature | always | 2010-08-27 23:39 | 2010-09-08 09:59 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | dgamez | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Cannot access ORANGE zone from OpenVPN Roadwarrior | ||||
| Description: |
Cannot access to DMZ in ORANGE zone from OpenVPN Roadwarrior (without firewalls on the client side). Have set all possible access rules in Port forwarding / NAT, Outgoing traffic, Inter-Zone traffic, VPN traffic, OpenVPN server configuration, OpenVPN Accounts and Advanced OpenVPN settings. Also Firewalls on the ORANGE Servers have been disabled. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | Documentation says that checking the "Push route to orange zone:" on the OpenVPN Account is enough, but it isn't. | ||||
| Attached Files: | openvpn.jpg (117 KB) 2010-08-27 23:39 | ||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3134 | [Endian Firewall] Security | feature | have not tried | 2010-09-07 19:12 | 2010-09-07 19:12 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | Renee | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | |||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Please update Snort to latest release | ||||
| Description: | Because VRT rules support for Snort 2.8.5.x rules will be end of life at 22.10.2010 see http://www.snort.org/snort-rules [^] | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3132 | [Endian Firewall] GUI | major | always | 2010-09-06 15:41 | 2010-09-06 15:41 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | maxxer | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Web GUI partially working with Firefox4 | ||||
| Description: |
I did a fresh install of EFW2.4 and was using Firefox4. At first, after reboot, when you go to the first page of the configuration wizard, pressing the "Next" button reloads the same page. Same happens by clicking some buttons i.e. in the IPSec VPN config. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 264 | [Endian Firewall] Network related (VPN, uplinks) | feature | N/A | 2007-09-25 11:53 | 2010-09-06 12:25 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | clubbing80s | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | peter | OS: | |||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | resolved | Product Version: | |||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | fixed | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Active directory authentication for openvpn | ||||
| Description: |
I got this in reply to one of my postings, it wasn't what I wanted but is a great idea ... It provides autentication for openvpn against and active directory server... hope it helps .. #!/usr/bin/perl use Net::LDAP; $USER=$ENV{'username'}; $PASS=$ENV{'password'}; $ldap = Net::LDAP->new( 'ldap://172.24.254.1' [^] ) or die "$@"; #$mesg = $ldap->bind ; # an anonymous bind $mesg = $ldap->bind( "$USER\@domain.com", password => "$PASS" #$mesg = $ldap->bind( "CN=$USER,CN=Users,DC=domain,DC=com", # password => "$PASS" ); if ($mesg->code) { die $mesg->error; exit 1; } else { # print "Auth OK\n"; exit 0; } this works for AD. you may have to tweak it for your LDAP. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | openvpn-additional-config-save-persistent.patch (2 KB) 2010-09-06 12:25 | ||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3002 | [Endian Firewall] Backup and Updates | major | always | 2010-06-14 10:41 | 2010-09-06 11:08 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | aender | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | feedback | Product Version: | 2.3.1 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Daily Backup doesn´t work | ||||
| Description: |
We changed our weekly backup to daily backup. Now backup works no longer. What´s wrong? See attached screenshots. Endian 2.3.1 Enterprise. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: |
backup.jpeg (68 KB) 2010-06-14 10:41 backup2.jpeg (43 KB) 2010-06-14 10:41 |
||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3131 | [Endian Firewall] GUI | feature | always | 2010-09-03 14:14 | 2010-09-03 14:14 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | aender | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Connected VPN User at the dashboard | ||||
| Description: | Please add a section for all connected VPN Users to the dashboard. | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3130 | [Endian Firewall] Proxy HTTP | major | always | 2010-09-02 11:49 | 2010-09-03 11:08 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | smai | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | Anonymous | OS: | |||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | resolved | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | fixed | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Change user ncsa password does not work | ||||
| Description: |
I have added users in the local user database. When the user change the password he become a message "user does not exists". The ticket with id 0003083 has the same problem. The problem was fixed in version 2.4. Does not right, i use the v 2.4 and i have the same issue. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | error.gif (10 KB) 2010-09-02 11:49 | ||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3009 | [Endian Firewall] Proxy SMTP | minor | random | 2010-06-15 10:23 | 2010-09-02 20:32 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | baldy | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | After adding an exception to the SMTP proxy whitelist sender amavis dies | ||||
| Description: |
When I add a new exception to the SMTP proxy whitelist and clicking on Save Amavis dies. I have to use restartsmtpscan.py to reactivate it. When using the restart script the message is "Amavis dead, but subsystem locked". I have had this issue on a few 2.2 machines as well. Not sure if it is memory/processor speed related, but I do not experience the same issue on a high spec machine. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: |
Machines it happens on : Dell Optiplex GX1 PIII-733Mhz 128MB EFW 2.2 Dell Optiplex GX1 PIII-1GHz 512MB EFW 2.4 Machines it does not happen on : Dell Optiplex GX1 PIII-866MHz 256MB EFW 2.4 IBM Netvista Celeron 1,3GHz 256MB EFW 2.4 Dell Optiplex GX1 PIII-733MHz 128MB EFW 2.2 Asus P5GD1-VML P4-541 2,8GHz 2GB EFW 2.4 |
||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 1541 | [Endian Firewall] Proxy HTTP | major | always | 2009-02-01 15:13 | 2010-09-02 18:20 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | abbas_aj | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | simon | OS: | |||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | feedback | Product Version: | 2.2-rc3 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | httpReadReply: Excess data from | ||||
| Description: |
this has become a continues error, I have been monitoring it since the time I have installed it, & along with that I keep getting TCP Connection to 127.0.0.1/9999 failed |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3129 | [Endian Firewall] Application Level Proxies | tweak | always | 2010-08-31 10:35 | 2010-08-31 14:15 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | baldy | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | DNS Proxy should not filter traffic over VPN | ||||
| Description: |
After implementing the DNS proxy on several locations I found that the DNS proxy is filtering DNS traffic over the OpenVPN connections. Due to this filtering logging on to servers fails when a DC in the remote site validates the logon request. Imho the DNS proxy should only filter traffic going through the RED interface. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3119 | [Endian Firewall] Network related (VPN, uplinks) | crash | always | 2010-08-17 21:35 | 2010-08-31 09:54 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | yhenao | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | confirmed | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | IPSEC VPN block the system endian. | ||||
| Description: |
When I created a site to site IPSEC vpn, the system is blocked and I have restart the system. The VPN is open but when I am sending traffic through the vpn the system endian is completely blocked. I have create VPN to FORTINET and ENDIAN 2.3, 2.4 and 25 user lisence and always the same problem. if I only do ping the system is stable but if I send web traffic as RDP or WEB GUI the system is down. Regards, Yamidt |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3128 | [Endian Firewall] Other Scripts | minor | always | 2010-08-30 17:03 | 2010-08-30 17:03 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | MatthiasL | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Routes set via network menu are not recognized at connections overview with right color | ||||
| Description: |
When I set routes via Network --> Routing for example to an internal subnet, wich is different from the subnet assigned to the green nic. The connections overview (Status --> Connections) is showing this subnet as a red one instead of a green one. If I set the route via "route add -net ..." the subnet has the color "green" in the connections overview. Since I found out, that the routes set via the GUI are not written to the system with "route add ...", I think I found the problem. The script "/home/httpd/cgi-bin/connections.cgi" is assigning the colors to the diffrent subnets, but it is only looking for subnets with the command "route -n ...". In this case the routes set via the GUI can never be found by the script and the colors will be assigned wrong (red). Greetings |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2998 | [Endian Firewall] Network related (VPN, uplinks) | major | always | 2010-06-11 15:49 | 2010-08-30 12:58 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | aender | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | feedback | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Static Routes doesn´t work | ||||
| Description: |
I configured a static route at the gui but it doesn´t work. Also a route print doesn´t show the entry If i do a manual route add it works perfect. route add -net 10.48.248.0/24 gw 10.48.16.9 Also i doesn´t understand why the same entry automatically at policy routing is created that i configured at static routes in the gui. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | routing.png (57 KB) 2010-07-15 09:59 | ||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3014 | [Endian Firewall] Application Level Proxies | minor | always | 2010-06-17 22:12 | 2010-08-28 19:11 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | bnhansen | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | HTTP Proxy Contentfilter doesn't activate | ||||
| Description: | After having created a new ContentFilter profile & applying it, the ContentFilter status remains STOPPED even after a reboot. Changing the profile & saving it does not activate the contentfilter either. Going to a website that should be blocked is not blocked by the endian firewall. After activating the contentfilter, there are no contentfilter logs produced. I have not found a way to activate the contentfilter. | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3053 | [Endian Firewall] Network related (VPN, uplinks) | major | always | 2010-07-06 20:54 | 2010-08-27 19:16 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | Mo_Hong | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Problems when editing or adding hosts | ||||
| Description: |
After upgrading from 2.2 and 2.3 to 2.4, we detected that when you tried to edit or add a host in Network -> Edit Hosts, the system lets you input the information for the host, or edit the information, but after you press "update", the hosts table looses the IP information of all hosts. Example: 1. Original Table IP Hostname Domain 192.168.0.1 example domain.com After pressing "update" 2. Table looses information IP Hostname Domain example domain.com We have already tried in two different installs, one upgraded from 2.2 to 2.4 and the second one from 2.3 to 2.4 |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2977 | [Endian Firewall] Proxy SMTP | minor | always | 2010-06-04 20:39 | 2010-08-23 18:54 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | baldy | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | confirmed | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Postfix errors | ||||
| Description: |
Postfix gives a few minor errors which can be easily fixed. warning: database /etc/postfix/relay_domains.db is older than source file /etc/postfix/relay_domains warning: database /etc/postfix/transport.db is older than source file /etc/postfix/transport warning: database /etc/postfix/sender_rules.db is older than source file /etc/postfix/sender_rules warning: database /etc/postfix/recipient_rules.db is older than source file /etc/postfix/recipient_rules These errors can be fixed with the following commands. postmap /etc/postfix/transport postmap /etc/postfix/relay_domains postmap /etc/postfix/sender_rules postmap /etc/postfix/recipient_rules After that a restartsmtpscan.py to reload postfix. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3124 | [Endian Firewall] Other Services | minor | always | 2010-08-23 16:23 | 2010-08-23 16:23 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | mvrk | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | ntop won't show remote traffic | ||||
| Description: |
Hi, I've installed EFW 2.4, and when i go to ntop IP -> Traffic directions -> local to remote or remote to local i get this message: No Data To Display (yet) I've got two red interfaces on my EFW, 192.168.69.1 and 192.168.70.1, it seems that ntop is considering the traffic that goes to those interface as local. Could be a bug of ntop or bad configuration? |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3075 | [Endian Firewall] Installation | major | always | 2010-07-21 10:24 | 2010-08-20 08:38 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | mehdi560 | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Could not install endian 2.4 on HP DL360 G5 | ||||
| Description: |
Hello I try to install endian 2.4 on HP DL360G5 I did mknod -m 660 /dev/cciss/c0d01 b 104 1 mknod -m 660 /dev/cciss/c0d02 b 104 2 mknod -m 660 /dev/cciss/c0d03 b 104 3 mknod -m 660 /dev/cciss/c0d04 b 104 4 mknod -m 660 /dev/cciss/c0d05 b 104 5 installation done successfully but when server start it has panic!!! is there any solution? |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 1820 | [Endian Firewall] Network related (VPN, uplinks) | minor | random | 2009-04-24 16:13 | 2010-08-18 23:50 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | lucagiove | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | peter | OS: | |||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | confirmed | Product Version: | 2.2-rc3 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Remote web access through an ipsec vpn crash the firewall | ||||
| Description: |
Sometimes if you have an ipsec tunnel and log in through the web gui. The firewall suddenly crash. This problem has been found 2 times: 1) ipsec tunnel between two Endian firewalls 2) ipsec tunnel between Endian and Vasco aXsGuard |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: |
The crash indeed happens *only* when we try to access the firewall via web-GUI, _after_ the authentication. SSH, ping, etc.. seem to work fine trough VPN.. |
||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2187 | [Endian Firewall] Network related (VPN, uplinks) | major | always | 2009-09-22 16:57 | 2010-08-18 04:49 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | kourush | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | peter | OS: | |||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | feedback | Product Version: | |||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | reopened | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | push dns and domain missing in openvpn.conf | ||||
| Description: |
"Push these nameservers" and "Push domain" in openvpn advanced tab not work mush add manual "push domain" and "push dns" in openvpn.conf.tmpl i don't know why never reported this bug. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3083 | [Endian Firewall] Proxy - HTTP | minor | always | 2010-07-26 16:18 | 2010-08-17 17:17 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | lucagiove | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | simon | OS: | |||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | resolved | Product Version: | 2.3.1 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | fixed | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | ncsa proxy password change doesn't work | ||||
| Description: |
The page is completely spoiled and doesn't work, you always get "Username does not exist" See the screen shot. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | change web pass.jpg (167 KB) 2010-07-26 16:18 | ||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2622 | [Endian Firewall] GUI | minor | sometimes | 2010-01-18 23:57 | 2010-08-16 22:10 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | ischilling | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | acknowledged | Product Version: | 2.3 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Dashboard graph for in-/outgoing traffic does stop working | ||||
| Description: | After 8 to 10 days in running, we realized that the gaph does stop working. Reboot the firewall does do the trick - but that can't be the solution, nor? | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3114 | [Endian Firewall] Application Level Proxies | feature | N/A | 2010-08-15 16:33 | 2010-08-15 16:33 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | lestat215 | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | SIP Border Control Support | ||||
| Description: |
Enabling SBC support on Endian would be a great addition as the current SIP proxy implementation aids in the NAT traversal only for outbound phone connections. An increasingly common scenario is for external phones to connect to SIP registrars behind a NAT device or firewall which breaks VoIP unless full-cone NAT is supported. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3113 | [Endian Firewall] Proxy - DNS | minor | always | 2010-08-13 09:37 | 2010-08-13 09:37 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | ra | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | ra | OS: | |||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | confirmed | Product Version: | |||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | the malware dns download should use the mirror site as well as randomize the time the files are downloaded | ||||
| Description: |
The malware dns download should use the mirror site as well as randomize the time the files are downloaded Mirror1: http://mirror1.malwaredomains.com/ [^] |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | - we can use anacron instead of cron | ||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3112 | [Endian Firewall] Installation | feature | N/A | 2010-08-12 18:01 | 2010-08-12 18:01 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | Nic | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Kernel-dev-Package is missing | ||||
| Description: |
The Kernel-dev-Package for the standard-kernel is missing!! For SMP and PAE it's available... |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3108 | [Endian Firewall] Network related (VPN, uplinks) | major | unable to reproduce | 2010-08-11 10:57 | 2010-08-11 10:57 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | xxxomxxx | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | WAN Provider DHCP IP Update on RED does not work | ||||
| Description: |
Update of DHCP lease by Providermodem on RED does not work automatically, had to do it manually |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | Endian running on vSphere 4 | ||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3097 | [Endian Firewall] Network related (VPN, uplinks) | feature | N/A | 2010-08-04 18:28 | 2010-08-10 21:11 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | pbr | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | feedback | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | route based vpns | ||||
| Description: |
Hello, It would be greate to have route based vpns (ex with tunnel interfaces) Regards, pbr |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2988 | [Endian Firewall] Installation | block | always | 2010-06-09 09:50 | 2010-08-06 16:27 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | hulud | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | christian | OS: | |||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | feedback | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | reopened | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Installation impossible on processors without cmove feature | ||||
| Description: |
Installing Endian 2.4 on a VIA C3 processor i got this error: "This kernel requires the following features not present on the CPU: cmov Unable to boot - please use a kernel appropriate for your CPU." |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | EPIA motherboard | ||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2997 | [Endian Firewall] Proxy SMTP | major | random | 2010-06-11 10:12 | 2010-08-03 14:46 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | deadmalc | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | feedback | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Postfix locking up, unable to restart without reboot | ||||
| Description: | Sending emails randomly causes postfix to lock up, the only solution is a reboot of the box | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: |
I have applied the latest efw-update fixes, this seems to have improved things slightly as now the whole box no longer freezes (unless I just managed to catch it this time before the issue had gone out of control, previously trying to access any file caused the process then to lock up, this time it seemed to be isolated to amavisd and postfix) Restarting postfix causes the hash on /etc/aliases to hang and amavisd will not shutdown After shutting postfix down fine, and attempting to restart it.... root 9239 9212 0 08:03 pts/0 00:00:00 /bin/bash /etc/init.d/postfix start root 9244 9239 0 08:03 pts/0 00:00:00 /usr/sbin/postalias hash /etc/aliases root@saaflanfirewall:/var/log # /etc/init.d/amavisd stop Shutting down Mail Virus Scanner (amavisd): [ OK ] ps -efroot@saaflanfirewall:/var/log # ps -ef|fgrep amavis amavis 5416 1 0 07:07 ? 00:00:00 amavisd (ch1-finish) amavis 5417 1 0 07:07 ? 00:00:00 amavisd (ch0-finish) amavis 5418 1 0 07:07 ? 00:00:00 amavisd (ch0-finish) amavis 5419 1 0 07:07 ? 00:00:00 amavisd (ch0-finish) amavis 5421 1 0 07:07 ? 00:00:00 amavisd (ch0-finish) amavis 5423 1 0 07:07 ? 00:00:00 amavisd (ch0-finish) amavis 5424 1 0 07:07 ? 00:00:00 amavisd (ch0-finish) amavis 5427 1 0 07:07 ? 00:00:00 amavisd (ch0-finish) amavis 5429 1 0 07:07 ? 00:00:00 amavisd (ch0-finish) amavis 5430 1 0 07:07 ? 00:00:00 amavisd (ch0-finish) amavis 5431 1 0 07:07 ? 00:00:00 amavisd (ch0-finish) root 9456 9212 0 08:03 pts/0 00:00:00 fgrep amavis root@saaflanfirewall:/var/log # killall amavisd root@saaflanfirewall:/var/log # killall amavisd root@saaflanfirewall:/var/log # killall amavisd root@saaflanfirewall:/var/log # killall -9 amavisd root@saaflanfirewall:/var/log # killall -9 amavisd root@saaflanfirewall:/var/log # killall -9 amavisd root@saaflanfirewall:/var/log # killall -9 amavisd root@saaflanfirewall:/var/log # ps -ef|fgrep amavis amavis 5416 1 0 07:06 ? 00:00:00 amavisd (ch1-finish) amavis 5417 1 0 07:06 ? 00:00:00 amavisd (ch0-finish) amavis 5418 1 0 07:06 ? 00:00:00 amavisd (ch0-finish) amavis 5419 1 0 07:06 ? 00:00:00 amavisd (ch0-finish) amavis 5421 1 0 07:06 ? 00:00:00 amavisd (ch0-finish) amavis 5423 1 0 07:06 ? 00:00:00 amavisd (ch0-finish) amavis 5424 1 0 07:06 ? 00:00:00 amavisd (ch0-finish) amavis 5427 1 0 07:06 ? 00:00:00 amavisd (ch0-finish) amavis 5429 1 0 07:06 ? 00:00:00 amavisd (ch0-finish) amavis 5430 1 0 07:06 ? 00:00:00 amavisd (ch0-finish) amavis 5431 1 0 07:06 ? 00:00:00 amavisd (ch0-finish) root 9239 9212 0 07:56 pts/0 00:00:00 /bin/bash /etc/init.d/postfix start root 9244 9239 0 07:56 pts/0 00:00:00 /usr/sbin/postalias hash /etc/aliases root 9468 9212 0 08:03 pts/0 00:00:00 ps -ef root@saaflanfirewall:/var/log # kill 9244 root@saaflanfirewall:/var/log # kill 9244 root@saaflanfirewall:/var/log # kill 9244 root@saaflanfirewall:/var/log # kill -9 9244 root@saaflanfirewall:/var/log # kill -9 9244 root@saaflanfirewall:/var/log # kill -9 9244 root@saaflanfirewall:/var/log # ps -ef|fgrep postalias root 9244 9239 0 07:56 pts/0 00:00:00 /usr/sbin/postalias hash /etc/aliases root 9470 9212 0 08:03 pts/0 00:00:00 fgrep postalias |
||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3005 | [Endian Firewall] GUI | major | sometimes | 2010-06-14 18:38 | 2010-07-30 18:14 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | baldy | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Upgrade EFW2.2 ->2.4 breaks GUI | ||||
| Description: |
After upgrade the GUI is broken in the Firewall section. Rules cannot be applied without a reboot. Screen is shown with both Orange (rules have been applied) and Green (with Apply button) So far this has happened on 2 systems I have upgraded from 2.2 to 2.4 |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: |
Screenshot has been added with the issue. Happens with IE8, Google Chrome and Firefox, so it is not a browser related issue. |
||||
| Attached Files: | GUI damaged.jpg (163 KB) 2010-06-14 18:38 | ||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3057 | [Endian Firewall] Firewall (iptables) | major | always | 2010-07-09 23:46 | 2010-07-30 18:14 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | Mo_Hong | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Port forwarding / Destination NAT rules do not get applied | ||||
| Description: |
When trying to add a new Port forwarding / Destination NAT rule, the green apply bubble appears with the following message: Port forwarding / Destination NAT rules have been changed and need to be applied in order to make the changes active After pressing the button, the orange bubble, with the "rules have been applied" appears with the green one below and the rules do not take effect. You must restart the EFW so the rules get applied, and the green bubble does not appear until you add another rule. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3089 | [Endian Firewall] GUI | tweak | always | 2010-07-29 16:33 | 2010-07-29 16:33 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | baldy | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | SMTP, POP3 proxy and IDS counters not updated correctly | ||||
| Description: |
When leaving the GUI open in a browser the counters are not reset properly after 24 hours and numbers keep adding up. Only a full refresh of the page shows the correct numbers again. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: |
Tested in Firefox, can not test in IE due to memory leak in combination with the GUI. Screenshot have been added for clarification. First screenshot is taken after the GUI was open for around 46 hours, the second immediately after refresh. |
||||
| Attached Files: |
Counters before refresh.jpg (167 KB) 2010-07-29 16:33 Counters after refresh.jpg (162 KB) 2010-07-29 16:33 |
||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3088 | [Endian Firewall] Proxy - SMTP | minor | always | 2010-07-29 15:53 | 2010-07-29 15:54 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | lucagiove | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.3.1 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | mail routing changes are not applied | ||||
| Description: | Seems that the button "save changes and restart" doesn't trig the smtp proxy restart so the changes are not really applied. | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2852 | [Endian Firewall] Hardware related (kernel, drivers, hardware) | minor | have not tried | 2010-04-18 09:53 | 2010-07-28 21:11 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | tomek | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | feedback | Product Version: | |||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Dell R210 server with Broadcom's BCM5716 network chipset not detecting | ||||
| Description: |
When trying to install, it appears that the interfaces on a Dell R210 are not detecting. I did some research and found this: http://blog.akkaya.de/jpabel/2010/01/22/NetXtreme-II-BCM5716-on-Ubuntu-8-04 [^] Could someone create a fix for this? |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3087 | [Endian Firewall] Proxy - HTTP | minor | always | 2010-07-27 18:15 | 2010-07-28 10:07 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | lucagiove | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.3.1 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | squid hard disk cache can't be zero | ||||
| Description: |
The user can set Cache size on harddisk (MB) * to 0 resulting in a FATAL: storeAufsDirParse error causing the termination of Squid cache. From restartproxy.py: init_cache_dir /var/spool/squid... /etc/init.d/squid: line 55: 512 Aborted $SQUID -z -F -D >>/var/log/squid/squid.out 2>&1 Starting squid: /etc/init.d/squid: line 54: 514 Aborted $SQUID $SQUID_OPTS >>/var/log/squid/squid.out 2>& [FAILED] Log from: /var/log/squid/squid.out FATAL: storeAufsDirParse: invalid size value Squid Cache (Version 2.6.STABLE22): Terminated abnormally. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3082 | [Endian Firewall] Other Services | major | always | 2010-07-26 15:03 | 2010-07-26 15:03 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | sbashir | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Services, QoS, Rules, always shows high priority even if you select meduim or low. | ||||
| Description: | after applying rules on QoS, like high priority for an ip, after applying if you go back to check it shows high priority, but medium or what ever you have selected will be applied. | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2943 | [Endian Firewall] GUI | minor | have not tried | 2010-05-28 22:08 | 2010-07-23 05:52 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | leso | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | peter | OS: | |||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | feedback | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | reopened | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | After upgrade 2.3 to 2.4 , network statistics are not displayed | ||||
| Description: |
After a upgrade of 2.3 to a 2.4 , with efw-upgrade (community version) the old statistics on network traffic graphs aren't displayed. The new graphs (new statistics) are also not appear. thx KR |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | On 2.3 production , graphs was always displayed. | ||||
| Attached Files: | libipt_standard.so (4 KB) 2010-07-05 08:12 | ||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3081 | [Endian Firewall] Network related (VPN, uplinks) | minor | always | 2010-07-22 16:14 | 2010-07-22 16:24 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | 1und1 | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.3.1 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Endian Firewall sends icmp redirects | ||||
| Description: |
The following configuration causes the Endian to send icmp-redirects: 1. traffic enters the Endian Firewall from networ A 2. the Endians default gateway G is located in network A 3. the traffic is destined to network B behind gateway W This is bad because 1. if icmp redirects are accepted, the Endian Firewall is bypassed for the affected traffic. a) Meaning that the affected traffic is longer being inspected. b) Meaning that in case the Endian is used for IP-masquerading (NAT), the affected traffic is no longer being NATed, interrupting connectivity. 2. icmp redirects are not always honored by the client meaning traffic patterns become somewhat unpredictable. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: |
In our network setup, an Endian Appliance is supposed to NAT and inspect traffic to external destinations for clients with private IP-addresses. World | +-----------+ | Gateway W | +-----------+ | +--------+ | +-----------+ | Endian |------+-------| Gateway A |---------some clients +--------+ n | +-----------+ e | +-----------+ t +-------| Gateway B |---------some other clients w | +-----------+ o | +-----------+ r +-------| Gateway C |---------way more clients k | +-----------+ | +-----------+ A +-------| Gateway D |---------here be dragons | +-----------+ ... We think this behaviour was introduced as an intended fix for bug 0001515. However we consider it to be just an ugly workaround as it doesn't really fix the problem in all cases, and instead the ill advised network setup in the referenced bug report should be changed. |
||||
| Attached Files: | network.png (19 KB) 2010-07-22 16:24 | ||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2709 | [Endian Firewall] Firewall (iptables) | minor | sometimes | 2010-02-22 14:54 | 2010-07-22 15:48 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | matictec | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | acknowledged | Product Version: | 2.3 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | sometimes if uplink reconnects connections remain in connection tracking table with old information causing the service to stop | ||||
| Description: |
We have an 3CX VoIP PBX that registers VoIP-Provider using standard SIP. This works correctly. When the RED-interface get a new IP from dsl-provider after reconnect, the voip-provider can not be registered by the pbx. A wireshark capture on the server shows that the packets by the pbx are correctly, but on the endian we can not see any incoming answer. We tried different setups, one xen-based environment, one virtualbox environment and also a pysical environment. This problem only occurs with the endian. Other Firewalls and Router does not have this problem. Please help and thanks for effort. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3077 | [Endian Firewall] Hotspot | major | sometimes | 2010-07-21 16:35 | 2010-07-21 16:35 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | lucagiove | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.3.1 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Sometimes the browser return a loop error | ||||
| Description: |
See the screenshot. It happened at least 3 times with different test system firefox and chrome. With some sort of restart it disappeared but... |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | hotspot-loop.png (134 KB) 2010-07-21 16:35 | ||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3076 | [Endian Firewall] Hotspot | major | have not tried | 2010-07-21 16:32 | 2010-07-21 16:32 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | lucagiove | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.3.1 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Login page is not available | ||||
| Description: |
Customer claims that the hotspot login page is not available.. :( The error is attached. (this is the Studentato/Dormitorio customer Macro X1 with about 200 hotspot users) |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | hotspot-error.png (59 KB) 2010-07-21 16:32 | ||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2667 | [Endian Firewall] GUI | major | always | 2010-02-11 13:36 | 2010-07-18 15:19 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | aender | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | confirmed | Product Version: | 2.3 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | IDS is not starting if after disable an enable it again | ||||
| Description: |
First time we start IPS/Snort it would be started and shows correct at the dashboard with status ON. Now we disable Snort and it would be stop and shows a correct status OFF at dashboard. Now we enable Snort once again. We doesn´t see if it starts or not. Also the status at dashboard still shows OFF. Pressing save and restart button doesn´t change anything. Also after reenabling Snort the "Automatically fetch SNORT rules" is disabled. If we enable "Automatically fetch SNORT rules" and do a "save and restart" the gui shows a message that snort would be starting. Now the status at dashboard is ON. So i think there would be something wrong within the scripts for starting snort. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3065 | [Endian Firewall] GUI | minor | always | 2010-07-18 15:15 | 2010-07-18 15:15 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | g13013 | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Unable to activate SSH Access from GUI | ||||
| Description: | On a fresh installation i was not able to activate SSH access from the gui | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: |
Endian Firewall 2.4 hosted on VMWare |
||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 1716 | [Endian Firewall] Firewall (iptables) | feature | N/A | 2009-03-30 21:40 | 2010-07-17 14:19 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | lightningbit | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.2-rc3 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Auto blocking IP based on SNORT logs | ||||
| Description: |
An optional module which 1/monitors the SNORT log, and can take action when it detects certain violations (like a portscan, or a very critical alert/attack is happening) by automatically blocking (thus adapting the firewall rules) the abusive IP address or even complete CDIR block 2/Add to that the ability (an extra option) to easily enter a list of CIDR to be blocked proactively (in an easier way then creating firewall rules for every few CDIR blocks) the 2nd option comes from the need by a lot of people to be able to quickly block e.g. the China, Korean, Nigerian CDIR blocks from a source like this (http://www.okean.com/sinokoreacidr.txt) [^] it would be great added feature making EFW an even stronger firewall I would appreciate the feedback on how this feature request will be received/considered thanks |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: |
IPCOP used to have such module, called GUARDIAN (not dansguardian) which worked very well for item 1/ above and I also used it for item 2/ |
||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3061 | [Endian Firewall] Proxy HTTP | block | always | 2010-07-15 19:56 | 2010-07-15 19:56 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | ideali | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Proxy not block all category selected | ||||
| Description: |
hello Dansguardian does not block the categories selected in the gui content filtering does not appear in the updated version 2.4 Is there a procedure to update the blacklists dansguardian? thanks The category blocked ara sex , ads. Stop Thanks |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | EndianDansguardian.jpg (126 KB) 2010-07-15 19:56 | ||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3060 | [Endian Firewall] Proxy HTTP | feature | always | 2010-07-13 20:49 | 2010-07-14 12:48 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | gennarom | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | AD authentication doesn't work | ||||
| Description: | Using same parameters (working) used in 2.2 and 2.3 release for AD auth, the proxy simply doesn't work! The browser doesn't ask me login form and displays ACCESS DENIED message for the requested URL, saying also:"Access control configuration prevents your request from being allowed at this time. Please contact your service provider if you feel this is incorrect. " | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: |
This issue happened always both in upgrade from 2.2/2.3 and in a fresh installation. |
||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3059 | [Endian Firewall] Proxy - SMTP | minor | sometimes | 2010-07-12 12:21 | 2010-07-12 12:21 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | lucagiove | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.3.1 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | spam admin wrong syntax | ||||
| Description: |
Jul 12 00:06:19 efw-xx-xx amavis[26286]: (26286-06) (!)SEND via SMTP: postmaster@efw-xx-xx.localdomain -> <luca@xx.com>,ENVID=AM..201007 11T220619Z@efw-xx-xx.localdomain 501 5.1.7 Failed, id=26286-06, from MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025): 501 5.1.7 Bad sender address syntax Jul 12 00:06:19 efw-xx-xx amavis[26286]: (26286-06) (!)FAILED to notify admin: 501 5.1.7 Failed, id=26286-06, from MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025): 501 5.1.7 B ad sender address syntax |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3017 | [Endian Firewall] GUI | tweak | always | 2010-06-19 14:16 | 2010-07-09 16:12 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | baldy | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | confirmed | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Disk usage section in the Status Information GUI needs some work | ||||
| Description: |
Lay-out of disk usage needs to be improved. Columns are not straight under each other. Also some elements have a bar graph and others do not. The numbers for size and free+used do not add up. Free+used is always less than size. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | Picture added, screen resolution used 1280*800. | ||||
| Attached Files: | Diskusage.jpg (146 KB) 2010-06-19 14:16 | ||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3041 | [Endian Firewall] Network related (VPN, uplinks) | major | always | 2010-07-03 00:12 | 2010-07-08 18:51 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | wolfcry0 | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | feedback | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | reopened | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Can't connect to firewall using IPSEC Road Warrior | ||||
| Description: |
When I try to connect to the firewall from windows 7 64 bit, the system log throws out this message "System - 2010-07-02 16:06:30 - pluto (30209) | no connection found" 3 times, and I get error 809 (Could not connect) on the windows VPN client The firewall shows the IPSEC service as running, and I've rebooted several times. I can port forward and connect to other services in the network through the firewall. I've tried both a PSK and a Certificate based connection, both have the same error. I really would like to get this working, any help is appreciated. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | ipsec issue.jpg (540 KB) 2010-07-03 00:15 | ||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2641 | [Endian Firewall] Proxy SMTP | crash | always | 2010-01-26 21:33 | 2010-07-08 14:38 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | aender | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | lucagiove | OS: | |||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | resolved | Product Version: | 2.3 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | fixed | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | SMTP Proxy not responding from external | ||||
| Description: |
i setup a smtp proxy configuration with red active. but a telnet to port 25 to red doesn´t work. absolutly no resonse. i checked again and again. only solution to get the smtp proxy to accept mails from outside is to add a system access rule from any to red on port 25. now all works fine. could it be the the system rules are buggy. show attached image |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: |
Bildschirmfoto 2010-01-26 um 21.30.44.png (100 KB) 2010-01-26 21:33 smtpscan.conf (0 KB) 2010-05-01 18:10 smtpscan.conf.tmpl (0 KB) 2010-05-01 18:10 |
||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3042 | [Endian Firewall] OpenVPN Client and Server | major | always | 2010-07-03 13:16 | 2010-07-07 16:18 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | _thebishop_ | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | feedback | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | OpenVPN routing problem | ||||
| Description: |
Having a EFW 2.4 configured as OpenVPN Server and one EFW 2.4 configured as OpenVPN Client, from a station behind the Server EFW I can reach any destination behind Client EFW but not the Client EFW itself (having configured TCP/22 and TCP/10443 System Access from any VPN source). Note that with the same System Access rules on the EFW Server I can reach the EFW Server from a station behind the Client EFW. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | Could be related to http://bugs.endian.com/view.php?id=3018 [^] | ||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3038 | [Endian Firewall] Hardware related (kernel, drivers, hardware) | tweak | sometimes | 2010-07-01 07:43 | 2010-07-06 04:51 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | vlongjvc | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | feedback | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | EFW TCP/IP tuning needed | ||||
| Description: |
I connect to a Webpage through EFW (upgraded from 2.3 to 2.4) and when I disconnected the connection is still in ESTABLISHED status. **************************************************************************** Legend: LAN INTERNET DMZ Wireless Endian Firewall VPN (IPsec) Source IP Source port Destination IP Destination port Protocol Status Expires 10.x.x.x 29707 72.14.254.100 80 (HTTP) tcp ESTABLISHED 67:09:03 ***************************************************************************** |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3024 | [Endian Firewall] Proxy HTTP | trivial | always | 2010-06-22 22:40 | 2010-07-05 18:50 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | brulinux | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | feedback | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Problem with authentication with AD | ||||
| Description: | I have a proxy server configured to use authentication with AD (NTLM), I import bills normally but can not surf, it seems he did not import the passwords and users correctly. What can it be? | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2839 | [Endian Firewall] Proxy HTTP | major | always | 2010-04-09 21:07 | 2010-07-05 18:48 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | lryc299 | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | ra | OS: | |||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | resolved | Product Version: | 2.3 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | fixed | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Proxy Auth and AD 2008R2 fail | ||||
| Description: |
Enterprise version. winbindd/smbd : Version 3.2.14-2.endian8 Domain join was successful. Users and groups are showing up in the GUI. Error in samba.log winbindd[7024]: rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:rpc_api_pipe(789) winbindd[7024]: rpc_api_pipe: Remote machine DC1R2.domain.local pipe \NETLOGON fnum 0x8003 returned critical error. Error was NT_STATUS_PIPE_DISCONNECTED |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3025 | [Endian Firewall] Proxy - HTTP | major | have not tried | 2010-06-23 18:55 | 2010-07-05 18:45 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | simon | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | feedback | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | ldap auth does not work if the count of chars of user/groups > 256 per rule | ||||
| Description: |
if to many users or groups are selected ldap_group_auth wont accept the request from ldap username check should not be done with ldap_group_auth |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3045 | [Endian Firewall] Firewall (iptables) | minor | N/A | 2010-07-05 18:34 | 2010-07-05 18:43 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | peter | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | confirmed | Product Version: | |||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | TODO: QoS rework - QoS collecting ticket | ||||
| Description: |
new kernel allows rewriting QoS in a more easier manner. Easier to understand and to configure. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3033 | [Endian Firewall] Hardware related (kernel, drivers, hardware) | minor | N/A | 2010-06-28 10:18 | 2010-07-05 18:43 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | peter | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | confirmed | Product Version: | |||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | missing drivers - hardware not working - collecting ticket | ||||
| Description: | this is a collecting ticket | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 1937 | [Endian Firewall] Other Services | minor | N/A | 2009-06-10 15:50 | 2010-07-05 18:43 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | peter | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | confirmed | Product Version: | |||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | issues to fix with ddns | ||||
| Description: | this ticket collects issues which need to be fixed in order to have a good working ddns | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 1935 | [Endian Firewall] Network related (VPN, uplinks) | minor | N/A | 2009-06-10 15:06 | 2010-07-05 18:43 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | peter | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | peter | OS: | |||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | confirmed | Product Version: | |||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | issues to fix with ipsec (openswan) | ||||
| Description: | this ticket collects issues which need to be fixed in order to have a good working ipsec | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2778 | [Endian Firewall] Other Scripts | minor | always | 2010-03-18 13:53 | 2010-07-05 18:38 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | aender | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.3 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | QoS Rule Editor | ||||
| Description: |
I created a QoS device and some classes. Also rules who are working now correctly since the efw-qos-2.3.19-1.endian5 package ;-) But if you want to edit an existing qos rule the drop down for "Destination Device / Traffic Class" shows you everytime the first entry regardless of what you have setup in the rule before. So if you change the ports and click save you have also changed the "Destination Device / Traffic Class". |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2065 | [Endian Firewall] Endian Firewall | minor | always | 2009-08-05 18:36 | 2010-07-05 18:37 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | peter | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | confirmed | Product Version: | |||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | QoS class id always increases, will never be freed when a class will be deleted | ||||
| Description: |
QoS class id always increases, will never be freed when a class will be deleted tc class show dev eth1 class hfsc 4: root class hfsc 4:1 parent 4: sc m1 0bit d 0us m2 200000bit ul m1 0bit d 0us m2 200000bit after delete of interface eth1 and re-creation of interface eth1: root@TESTbeta23:~ # tc class show dev eth1 class hfsc 6: root class hfsc 6:1 parent 6: sc m1 0bit d 0us m2 200000bit ul m1 0bit d 0us m2 200000bit |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2414 | [Endian Firewall] Network related (VPN, uplinks) | major | random | 2009-11-13 10:17 | 2010-07-05 18:37 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | aender | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | feedback | Product Version: | 2.3 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | QoS not always working | ||||
| Description: |
I have the rules in the attachment that should do the following. 1. High Priority for Citrix through my IPSec tunnel (local to head office) 2. Medium Priority for Citrix Printers through my IPSec tunnel (from head office to local) 3. Low Priority (Bluk Traffic) for the rest who goes to RED. Now sometimes, not at all, it could happens that my citrix session are very slow while a download from internet. First and Third Rule should prevent this! |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | Bildschirmfoto 2009-11-13 um 10.13.03.png (33 KB) 2009-11-13 10:17 | ||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2915 | [Endian Firewall] Application Level Proxies | major | random | 2010-05-24 15:34 | 2010-07-05 18:23 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | albaney | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | peter | OS: | |||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | resolved | Product Version: | 2.3 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | fixed | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | dnsmasq blocking cron | ||||
| Description: | The script getblackholedns.py sometimes became "defunct" and block the cron.daily (if the option "Spyware domain list update schedule" is mark for daily) | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: |
The log /var/log/messages presents the following line on this error: May 24 01:25:00 efwedu fcron[4163]: process already running: root's [ -x /bin/run-parts ] && run-parts --report /etc/cron.daily I have 3 endians and the same error occurs in everyone, but in random way: one day a endian stops run the cron.daily, another day other machine stops. |
||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3044 | [Endian Firewall] Application Level Proxies | major | random | 2010-07-05 18:23 | 2010-07-05 18:23 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | peter | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | confirmed | Product Version: | 2.3 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | TODO: check all cron scripts that they redirect stdout/stderr in order to prevent zombies | ||||
| Description: |
check all cron scripts that they redirect stdout/stderr in order to prevent zombies otherwise cron will not run the run-parts of the already running directory for a second time |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3039 | [Endian Firewall] OpenVPN Client and Server | minor | have not tried | 2010-07-01 16:22 | 2010-07-05 18:09 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | _thebishop_ | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | feedback | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | OpenVPN Client problem updating from 2.2 to 2.4 EFW | ||||
| Description: |
Updating from 2.2 to 2.4 EFW, a previously configured OpenVPN client session fails to connect. It's also impossible to modify or delete the configuration as in fact editing the tunnel settings actually create a new (working) tunnel with the same name. Trying to delete the old (non working) tunnel ends up deleting the new one leaving the old one intact. However this is not a blocking problem as the newly created client tunnel works well but there's no way to remove via the web interface the old one (that fails when trying to connect). |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 319 | [Endian Firewall] Installation | crash | always | 2007-11-18 15:34 | 2010-07-02 19:29 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | schosch99 | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | acknowledged | Product Version: | 2.1.2 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | reopened | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Community ISO - Installer reports "Segmentation fault" | ||||
| Description: |
Starting the installer from the Community-Iso leads to a blue screen, with the report "Segmentation fault" on the upper left corner. Then the screen switches to suspend, powers on again and the message appears again. This continues until one resets the computer. I also tested the ISO on a new vmware image on an notebook which was ok. I also got the error with the new 2.2 beta1 ISO image. CPU: VIA C3 600 Mhz Mainboard: VIA EPIA-PD (MiniITX-Board) RAM: 1x256 MB Graphic: VIA onboard |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | see also ID 0000205: (same error) | ||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3015 | [Endian Firewall] Network related (VPN, uplinks) | major | always | 2010-06-18 03:52 | 2010-07-02 07:03 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | akurz | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Uplink failover doesn't seem to work. Failed uplink doesn't come back online. | ||||
| Description: |
Automatic failover with two PPPoE WAN uplinks doesn't seem to work. unplugging main uplink causes complete disconnection while backup link is up. After plugging the line back in tha main uplink cannot re-establish connection until reboot. Failover after manually disabling main uplink works fine. See "Additional Information" for test description and attached screenshots for config. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: |
Test 1: 1. Rebooted EFW. Both uplinks are up. 2. Went to /Network/Interfaces/Uplink Editor and deactivated the main uplink. 3. Main uplink went to "INACTIVE" on dashboard. 3. Backup interface took over. Everything is working fine. Test 2: 1. Rebooted EFW. Both uplinks are up. 2. Pulled the DSL plug (between DSL modem and wall socket). 3. Main uplink went to "CONNECTING" on dashboard. 4. Backup interface DOES NOT take over. No internet connection through the EWF possible. In this state the main uplink switches back and forth between "CONNECTING" and "INACTIVE". The backup uplink stays "UP". And here comes the worst issue: when I re-connect the wire that I've unplugged before, the mail uplink switches between "CONNECTING" and "DEAD", but wouldn't go back up. The log shows this (repeating): Jun 18 03:16:02 pppd[20281] Plugin rp-pppoe.so loaded. Jun 18 03:16:02 pppd[20281] RP-PPPoE plugin version 3.3 compiled against pppd 2.4.4 Jun 18 03:16:02 pppd[20281] pppd 2.4.4 started by root, uid 0 Jun 18 03:16:02 pppd[20281] PPP session is 6613 Jun 18 03:16:02 pppd[20281] Using interface ppp1 Jun 18 03:16:02 pppd[20281] Connect: ppp1 <--> eth4 Jun 18 03:16:03 pppd[20281] CHAP authentication succeeded Jun 18 03:16:03 pppd[20281] CHAP authentication succeeded Jun 18 03:16:03 pppd[20281] peer from calling number 00:90:1A:42:8A:BE authorized Jun 18 03:16:03 pppd[20281] local IP address 212.114.255.119 Jun 18 03:16:03 pppd[20281] remote IP address 82.135.16.28 Jun 18 03:16:03 pppd[20281] primary DNS address 212.18.3.5 Jun 18 03:16:03 pppd[20281] secondary DNS address 212.18.0.5 Jun 18 03:16:09 pppd[20288] Terminating on signal 15 Jun 18 03:16:09 pppd[20288] Connect time 0.1 minutes. Jun 18 03:16:09 pppd[20288] Sent 120 bytes, received 40 bytes. Jun 18 03:16:09 pppd[20288] Connection terminated. Jun 18 03:16:09 pppd[20288] Exit. Jun 18 03:16:10 pppd[20762] Plugin rp-pppoe.so loaded. Jun 18 03:16:10 pppd[20762] RP-PPPoE plugin version 3.3 compiled against pppd 2.4.4 Jun 18 03:16:10 pppd[20762] pppd 2.4.4 started by root, uid 0 Jun 18 03:16:45 pppd[20762] Timeout waiting for PADO packets Jun 18 03:16:45 pppd[20762] Unable to complete PPPoE Discovery Jun 18 03:16:45 pppd[20762] Exit. Only a reboot brings me back online. The backup link showed "UP" all the time. This one might be a duplicate of case 0002213: "Endian Firewall not automatically change default route to the secondary uplink". |
||||
| Attached Files: | failover.jpg (156 KB) 2010-06-18 03:52 | ||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3027 | [Endian Firewall] Other Services | feature | N/A | 2010-06-25 18:59 | 2010-07-01 19:43 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | deepthought | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Add IGMP Proxy and Multicast-Support for supporting IPTV | ||||
| Description: |
(at least in germany) IPTV via VDSL etc. requires Multicast support. works with igmp proxy from http://sourceforge.net/projects/igmpproxy [^] and multicast-allow in iptables like iptables -I FORWARD -s 217.0.119.0/24 -d 224.0.0.0/4 -j ACCEPT iptables -I FORWARD -s 193.158.35.0/24 -d 224.0.0.0/4 -j ACCEPT iptables -I INPUT -d 224.0.0.0/4 -j ACCEPT iptables -I FORWARD -d 224.0.0.0/4 -j ACCEPT I think it would be a well received feature if you would have a "enable iptv"-switch. Not sure if that would work in other countries the same way though :/ |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2818 | [Endian Firewall] Other Scripts | minor | have not tried | 2010-04-06 15:44 | 2010-06-30 14:49 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | lucagiove | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | confirmed | Product Version: | 2.3 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | gui says "some error" on QoS | ||||
| Description: | When I add or modify a QOS Rule, i have the message 'some error' that appear under 'TOS/DSCP' see the screenshot | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: |
31-03-2010 10-26-38.png (53 KB) 2010-04-06 15:44 QoS devices.jpg (137 KB) 2010-05-04 19:29 QoS Classes.jpg (146 KB) 2010-05-04 19:30 Some Error.jpg (156 KB) 2010-05-04 19:30 80599.png (84 KB) 2010-06-30 14:27 |
||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3036 | [Endian Firewall] Application Level Proxies | tweak | N/A | 2010-06-30 09:14 | 2010-06-30 10:12 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | fabiana | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | confirmed | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Update SA | ||||
| Description: | Update from SpamAssassin version 3.2.5 to the current SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (which delivers much more updates on the rules). | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2914 | [Endian Firewall] Hardware related (kernel, drivers, hardware) | feature | always | 2010-05-23 19:37 | 2010-06-28 10:25 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | deepthought | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | acknowledged | Product Version: | 2.3 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Hyper-V Network-Drivers Support | ||||
| Description: | Support for Hyper-V native "Network Adapter", works currently only with mindboggingly slow "Legacy Network Adapter", max throughput approx 10 MBit | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | Running efw virtualized might not be the suggested way, but somehow keeps coming I guess. See: http://endian-forum.de/index.php?page=Thread&postID=85#post85 [^] (in german). Beside me there seem to be more users who would appreciate running a efw instance as Hyper-V Guest OS. | ||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2811 | [Endian Firewall] Other Services | major | always | 2010-04-02 06:53 | 2010-06-28 10:23 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | CALYSTO | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | acknowledged | Product Version: | 2.3 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | DNS Dynamic with zoneedit isn´t work for empty Host Name | ||||
| Description: |
Hi, i´m having problems with DNS Dynamic service when i use zoneedit. I put the file of the issue 0001372. This work´s fine when i complete something in the field of Host Name, zoneedit update really fast the changes. But in zoneedit i don´t need complete this field (Host Name), for that reason when i don´t write anything in Host Name, and click on Add, the line of the new dynamic dns appear but don´t update in the zoneedit zone. I come from IpCop but when i discover Endian, i try and try and try because this is a really good firewall and really like it, more than ipcop, but i can´t do work. Please help. Thanks for all. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3026 | [Endian Firewall] Hardware related (kernel, drivers, hardware) | minor | always | 2010-06-23 20:18 | 2010-06-28 10:21 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | jonassimpson | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | acknowledged | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Broadcom BCM57788 not detected | ||||
| Description: |
Installed 2.4 on three Dell Vostro 230 slim towers. Onboard Broadcom Ethernet is not detected. Device id shows up as vendor "14e4", device "1691". From a bit of research, the tg3 driver does support this chipset: http://cateee.net/lkddb/web-lkddb/TIGON3.html [^] I can't find the PCI ID in the module or in the source files. Maybe there is an easy way to add and recompile the module? |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3031 | [Endian Firewall] Hardware related (kernel, drivers, hardware) | trivial | have not tried | 2010-06-27 16:38 | 2010-06-28 10:20 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | baldy | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | acknowledged | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Via Rhine III (VT6105) not supported | ||||
| Description: |
On a system with the Via VT6105 card installed there is no driver loaded for this card. With lspci the card is shown, but no driver is loaded nor is there any message during boot about it. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 1927 | [Endian Firewall] Uncategorized | minor | N/A | 2009-06-09 20:45 | 2010-06-28 10:20 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | peter | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | |||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Reports to be checked - collecting ticket | ||||
| Description: |
Here we collect bug reports, which we can't handle immediately, because: - Issue *may be* already fixed in the latest version, but it has not be tried to reproduce on the newer versions. Needs confirmation that the issue still exists, otherwise ticket will be closed after a while. - Issue is not of interest anymore, due to hardware changes, feature changes/enhancements, ... Ticket will be closed after a while, if there is no response. - Issue description is to vague or not present at all. Needs more feedback. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3032 | [Endian Firewall] GUI | feature | always | 2010-06-28 00:30 | 2010-06-28 00:30 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | baldy | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | In the port forwarding section the only choice you have is Apply | ||||
| Description: | If one accidentally removes or changes a rule it would be nice to have a Cancel button next to the Apply button. | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3030 | [Endian Firewall] Application Level Proxies | major | always | 2010-06-26 10:49 | 2010-06-26 10:53 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | mschwenk | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Turning on FTP Proxy blocks FTP downloads via Browser like IE or FF | ||||
| Description: |
I use a transparent Http-Proxy. Port 21 is in the List of Ports. All works fine. As soon as i turn on the FTP-Proxy i can not download data via ftp from my Web-Browser. This was tested with IE, Firefox and Safari. Is there a config issue? I see traffic in the Logs of the Firewall. Seems like there is some redirection working and that the ftp connection is talking to the FW and is using it but the connection doesen´t seem to work. Best regards Mario |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3029 | [Endian Firewall] GUI | major | always | 2010-06-25 23:17 | 2010-06-25 23:17 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | mschwenk | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | After starting Snort empty config page | ||||
| Description: |
I installed new endian community 2.4 I updated snortrules and started snort. Now the mainpage of snort is just empty. (see atached pic) /usr/local/bin/restartsnortrules.py worked but didn´t change anything /usr/local/bin/restartsnort.py gave me following error: snort (pid 8695 8692) is running... Stopping snort: [ OK ] snort is stopped 2010-06-25 23:04:17,067 - restartsnort.py/enabled_rule_targets[8650] - INFO - Starting SNORT... Starting snort: [ OK ] Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/restartsnort.py", line 401, in ? exit(0) File "/usr/local/bin/restartsnort.py", line 58, in exit end_notifications() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/endian/core/logger.py", line 140, in end_notifications File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/endian/core/logger.py", line 266, in end_notifications File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/endian/core/notification.py", line 312, in end File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/endian/core/notification.py", line 238, in close OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/var/lock/services/snort.status' I created /var/lock/services/snort.status with touch Now the script worked but gui ist still broken. If i remove whole Folder /etc/snort the gui is there again but then it is not working because of missing configfiles. I reinstalled and had the same error again. Can you give me any advices? In generel Snort seems to run but is not accessable via gui. Best regards Mario |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | Unbenannt.JPG (131 KB) 2010-06-25 23:17 | ||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2879 | [Endian Firewall] Proxy HTTP | major | have not tried | 2010-04-29 15:48 | 2010-06-24 12:28 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | lucagiove | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | peter | OS: | |||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | resolved | Product Version: | 2.3 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | fixed | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | list out of range with many ldap users | ||||
| Description: |
Http Proxy authenticating against a Novell eDirectory. When a new rule is going to be created returns an error due to the high number of users (over 1000 users and about 100 groups). See the pic. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | 72797.png (61 KB) 2010-04-29 15:48 | ||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2986 | [Endian Firewall] Proxy HTTP | block | always | 2010-06-08 12:39 | 2010-06-24 12:27 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | lvfranz | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | simon | OS: | |||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | resolved | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | fixed | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | http proxy still writing conf | ||||
| Description: |
I have installed efw 2.4 in bridged mode, configured proxy http as not transparent, configured authentication in ldap v3, than create a new access policy, selected authentication required user, select the user, and message appear "writing squid configuration"....and is blocked here, the messege didn't go away. I have just reinstalled lot's of time and every time is the same. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2856 | [Endian Firewall] Proxy - HTTP | feature | always | 2010-04-20 10:47 | 2010-06-24 12:25 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | lucagiove | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | simon | OS: | |||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | resolved | Product Version: | |||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | fixed | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | LDAP users order | ||||
| Description: | Would it be possible to order LDAP users and groups on alphabetical order? Currently it lists users and groups in the order that they are created. | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3023 | [Endian Firewall] Proxy - HTTP | minor | always | 2010-06-22 12:03 | 2010-06-24 10:45 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | peter | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | peter | OS: | |||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | confirmed | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | fixed | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | BDC does not work anymore | ||||
| Description: |
if a bdc is configured restartsamba.py exits with a traceback after fixing the winbind.conf manually and putting the pdc down for testing the bdc, wbinfo does not respond. the problem is the /etc/krb5.conf file, where [realms] need a kdc= line for each password server instead of specifying them with a space-separated list. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2820 | [Endian Firewall] Proxy HTTP | minor | always | 2010-04-06 18:02 | 2010-06-23 16:13 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | simon | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | simon | OS: | |||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | confirmed | Product Version: | 2.3 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | If NETBIOS name differs from domain name UTM is not able to join | ||||
| Description: |
in winbind.conf netbios name is used for workgroup name at the moment the workgroup name is made by using the highest level domain is used, because it usually is the netbios name. we need a checkbox which enables the admin to define the netbios name of the pdc if it differs from the highest level domain. e.g.: domainname: test.local netbiosname: test |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3019 | [Endian Firewall] Network related (VPN, uplinks) | major | always | 2010-06-21 14:21 | 2010-06-22 01:18 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | fabiana | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | No QoS on Red | ||||
| Description: | QoS is still not working on the red interface. I can set wathever I want for Down/Upstream, it's ignored. It's a upgraded Endian from 2.3 -> 2.4. Not tried it with a new installation. During upgrade no QoS rules were active. | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3022 | [Endian Firewall] Other Services | minor | always | 2010-06-22 00:55 | 2010-06-22 00:55 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | Renee | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Qos iptables rules wrong / Qos must specific with source and destination ports | ||||
| Description: |
I lock in the iptables rules for qos and see a mistake your qos script create Iptables entrys with the same Port as source and destination this is wrong because the most applications use an other source Port to connect to the server so must the destination Port be an other or the qos works only in one direction. Please make a source and destination Port field in the rule editor available and chance your qos script that it creates iptables qos rules with source and destination port. At example: CLASSIFY source Port: 80 destinations Port: 0:65535 RETURN source Port: 0:65535 destination port: 80 So works the qos in both direction (see append) |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | I think the qos interface for red is wrong it must be by PPPOE Usern ppp0 because I have testet it with green when I use the physical dev qos not works when I use the brigde for green it works.But your Qos script only use the physical dev for the uplink. | ||||
| Attached Files: | Image1.jpg (283 KB) 2010-06-22 00:55 | ||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 3018 | [Endian Firewall] OpenVPN Client and Server | major | always | 2010-06-21 11:46 | 2010-06-21 11:46 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | Stevesix | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | OpenVPN Routing issue | ||||
| Description: |
After upgrade from version 2.3 OpenVPN seems no longer able to route data to and from remote clients after backup resume from the same version. All clients connect correctly, but no packet is sent through the tunnels. Running a trace clear how packets are routed via the first Internet connection available, rather than through the appropriate tunnels. This anomalous behavior is the same with a newly installed version 2.4. Re-execute a new test installation of version 2.3, keeping the same configuration, everything works properly and the data is routed through the correct tunnel. Other tests performed: New clean install of 2.3. Recovering a backup working with several pre-configured OpenVPN tunnels. The Web Interface no longer seems to work but the tunnel yes. Upgrade to 2.4. Now everything worked, but would need a new recovery from a backup of the current version, the tunnel would cease to function again. |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: |
My Config: 1 GREEN Interface. 2 RED Interface: The 1st interface (main) is an ADSL connection for web navigation only. The 2nd is an HDSL connection used to connect several remote office with OpenVPN. |
||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2805 | [Endian Firewall] GUI | feature | always | 2010-03-30 08:07 | 2010-06-21 08:30 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | petr konderla | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | petr konderla | OS: | |||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | resolved | Product Version: | 2.3 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | fixed | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | No possibility remark of the ip list in the firewall config. | ||||
| Description: |
Because in EFW 2.2 was this menu bit more simple there was option remark every ip which was wery useful. Mayby this way is enough without huge rework: 192.168.10.4 #myip 207.46.197.32 #ip of bill gates |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: | Untitled-2.jpg (30 KB) 2010-03-30 08:07 | ||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 2989 | [Endian Firewall] Log and Statistics | minor | sometimes | 2010-06-09 13:36 | 2010-06-20 20:34 |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | aender | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | feedback | Product Version: | 2.4 | ||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | Dashboard can show negative CPU usage | ||||
| Description: | It could happen that CPU usage is negative ( -2% ) | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Attached Files: |
cpu.JPG (115 KB) 2010-06-09 18:53 negative cpu.jpg (170 KB) 2010-06-15 22:12 |
||||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
| |||||